Santa Fe
Institute
  • Research
    • Themes
    • Projects
    • SFI Press
    • Researchers
    • Publications
    • Library
    • Sponsored Research
    • Fellowships
    • Miller Scholarships
  • News + Events
    • News
    • Newsletters
    • Podcasts
    • SFI in the Media
    • Media Center
    • Events
    • Community
    • Journalism Fellowship
  • Education
    • Programs
    • Projects
    • Alumni
    • Complexity Explorer
    • Education FAQ
    • Postdoctoral Research
    • Education Supporters
  • People
    • Researchers
    • Fractal Faculty
    • Staff
    • Miller Scholars
    • Trustees
    • Governance
    • Resident Artists
    • Research Supporters
  • Applied Complexity
    • Office
    • Applied Projects
    • ACtioN
    • Applied Fellows
    • Studios
    • Applied Events
    • Login
  • Give
    • Give Now
    • Ways to Give
    • Contact
  • About
    • About SFI
    • Engage
    • Complex Systems
    • FAQ
    • Campuses
    • Jobs
    • Contact
    • Library
    • Employee Portal

Science for a Complex World

Events

Here's what's happening

Give

You make SFI possible

Subscribe

Sign up for research news

Connect

Follow us on social media

© 2026 Santa Fe Institute. All rights reserved. This site is supported by the Miller Omega Program.

Home / News

Simon DeDeo and Elizabeth Hobson on equality and hierarchy

(Illustration: Shutterstock)
May 18, 2021

What determines the pecking order in a flock of birds? Or the page rank of a website in a Google search? Or which academics land the most prestigious jobs? Hierarchies are everywhere, and new research continues to advance our understanding of how and why some end up high and others low. As it turns out, if we look at the general patterns that emerge when hierarchies form, we can offer a single answer to each of these questions.

In a commentary this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences, SFI colleagues Simon DeDeo and Elizabeth Hobson* discuss advances in the science of social hierarchy. They put recent work by Daniel Larremore* and colleagues in the context of nearly a century of research into this most basic of social phenomena. They argue that if we boil down the patterns that researchers observe in biological, informational, and social hierarchies, we see that hierarchies tend to form in universal ways.

For some time, researchers studied rank and hierarchy through the lens of the horse race. In a horse race, jockeys accumulate points independently that determine their place in the order of things. Yet, as DeDeo and Hobson argue, in network systems, rank is a much more relative thing. 

When we adopt methods that capture the more holistic ways that hierarchies form, we start to see more clearly the universal patterns that obtain in any system of rank. 

Among the several universal qualities of hierarchies that DeDeo and Hobson elucidate, two stand out. First, as they form, hierarchies tend to create gaps between intrinsic value and relative value. Second, these gaps are not incorrigible. As DeDeo and Hobson conclude, hierarchies tend to form in ways that admit of re-engineering. 

Read the commentary, "From equality to hierarchy," in the Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences (May 25, 2021).

 

*Simon DeDeo is a member of SFI’s external faculty and a former SFI postdoctoral fellow, now based at Carnegie Mellon University. Elizabeth Hobson is a former SFI postdoctoral fellow now based at the University of Cincinnati. Daniel Larremore is a former SFI postdoctoral fellow now based at the University of Colorado, Boulder.





Share
  • Sign Up For SFI News
News Media Contact

Santa Fe Institute

Office of Communications
news@santafe.edu
505-984-8800



  • Tags
  • Opinion
  • SFI News Release
  • Research


More SFI News

View All News

Looking at AGI through the lens of natural intelligence

A simple baseline for AI forecasting in machine learning

Constantino Tsallis to co-chair the 2027 Nobel Symposium on Statistical Mechanics

How novelty arrives: Review of “The Origins of the New”

Working group asks, what’s the benefit of a brain?

Measuring irreversibility in gene transcription

ACtioN Academy engages industry leaders on AI and complexity

Arguing for a complex adaptive power grid

Mark Newman Awarded 2026 SIAM John von Neumann Prize

Review: Nonesuch, by SFI Miller Scholar Francis Spufford

Laurent Hébert-Dufresne to receive Young Scientist Award

What does it mean to compute?

Reassessing the scientific method

SFI External Professor Santiago Elena elected to the American Academy of Microbiology

From cells to companies: Study shows how diversity scales within complex systems

SFI Press launches “The Economy as an Evolving Complex System IV”

New dataset reveals how U.S. law has grown more complex over the past century

Boldness is key to avoiding self-censorship, model shows

SFI welcomes Program Postdoctoral Fellow Jordan Kemp

Disentangling the Boltzmann brain hypothesis: Memory, entropy, and time